Monday, November 12, 2012

Battleship Potemkin My favourite ..........



We are talking history, we are talking cinema of the montage, a resurgence of Russian revolt - an epic. So this is tribal....this is primal....this is Sergei Eisenstein’s battleship Potemkin!. An ostentatious masterpiece, it’s about a society where injustice and domination leads to mutiny and emancipation. The film is a powerful deterrent for an ex-soviet citizen speaking of the times the Russians were facing then. It’s That most famous of all Russian films, boasting of all the features that were once a trusted formula in many Hollywood flicks but which have now faded into obscurity while the unsinkable battleship is almost invariably in pride of place.
In Battleship Potemkin, The powerful communist propaganda was treated deftly in its portrayal of a then oppressed Russian society. The history of its release in the west is trailed with constant attempts by the censors to ban the film. 1954 saw the ban lifted in Britain.
The film lives revolutionary method of montage that makes it one of Einstein classic. But it is not answer enough since incendiary as the event may have been it can’t Willy Nelly its way to proclaiming the status of numero uno! Even now in the aftermath of the demise of Russian Communism, the Potemkin battles on. As its two dimensional semblance of  bally- hoo festers, the film has hit upon yet another layer which feeds the eternal need for rabble rousing  (protest) against any form of oppression.



When the film was shot, the use of the twelve apostle’s cruiser had swift impact. For the seven years that saw the film ban from theatres, there were no free seats in German cinemas. Even as Hitler rose to power, the crowds in Munich were craving for a glimpse of the battleship!. Goebbels, the German propaganda minister, called on German film-makers to channel Eisenstein’s brilliance in their own films saying, “I am convinced that if some cinema showed a film which portrayed our epoch in a true way, and if it was a true national socialist Potemkin, in such a cinema all the tickets would be sold Battleship Potemkin would fall flat as poll was called for. Film makers are not too fond of the montage technique anymore, it being dispersed and demystified - becoming a truism. Andrei Tarkovsky, the much celebrated master of “post Stalin” Soviet Cinema, publicly depreciated montage as effeminate and artless, because it "buttonholes", the audience and does not amount to an accurate entirety. The film doesn’t entertain a linear narrative and thought its black and white the absence of shading rather than color is an
People from post war era are much more used to a three-dimensional depiction of the pre-revolutionary aristocracy, members of which were shown advocating decadence, romance, confusion and decline making them more human than some mighty, relentless and outright revolutionaries. Adaptations of Chekov, Bondarchuk and Balgakov were frequently staged and televised inspiring nobility with profound implications. The film on the other hand cultivates a rather subliminal and streamlined story of real events, acted by dull, two-dimensional marionettes but nonetheless it was heartfelt to me for the way it harbors the need to disobey and strive for freedom against any form of inhuman oppression. Not for its numerous interpretations of reality, nor its montage technique. All of us have that basic instinct to crush that which holds us back; establish justice. Potemkin is more “anarchy” than “Communism” - more “early Christianity” than “Marxism-Leninism”. The film only pictures what triggered the mutiny on the ship – (the rotten meat) rather than explain the reasons for the revolution. Even then some scenes from the film strike upon orthodox icons – that lady with the murdered child as the reification of Mary, the mother of Jesus , benign citizens as modern martyrs And the battleship firing its mighty cannons at the tyrants is perhaps the image of God punishing the evil-men. The turbulence that Russia faces as Political chaos clouds the country almost a century after the film is not too different from the images in Eisenstein’s Potemkin!
Legacy: As the soviets' disappointment with the ways of changing the world grew after a decade of romance with the avant-garde, the Bolsheviks’ taste for experimentation was soon gone to be replaced by a sense of predictability that social realism reflects. nevertheless, that flirtation with experimentation resulted in a horde of classics, be it in, sculpture, theatre, painting, literature and of course, cinema – which, quotes Lenin is “the most important of all arts for socialist Russia “And it would be nothing short of blasphemy to question Eisenstein’s genius that evolved during this period. To this day, battleship Potemkin continues to be one of art’s (cinema) triumphant achievements and a favorite of critics and film-makers alike as constant inflow of ideas and innovations plague this extraordinary medium of cinema! off long in advance."Eisenstein's answered in an open letter:"Great art, true portrayal of life and life itself are only possible in the Soviet land.” a student of engineering and architecture, Eisenstein believed in transformation, defying machines and technology. He thought a world revolution was in order. In this belief he was quite a mnemonic deputy of the Russian intelligentsia of that time.